Welcome to the 2020 edition of the RW23 hitter projections for the Milwaukee Brewers. RW23 — creatively named after Rickie Weeks — was created in 2017 with the help of Mike Podhorzer and his book, “Projecting X 2.0: How to Forecast Baseball Player Performance.” Since its existence, RW23 has gone toe-to-toe with major projection systems Steamer and ZiPS. After the season ends, I’ll compare RW23 to both of those projection systems in order to see what system had the better year.

Remember projections are just projections. Don’t take them as fact. But feel free to bash them in the comments section.

C Omar Narvaez

	PA	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	wOBA	Hits	1B	2B	3B	HR	K%	BB%
RW23	450	.276	.355	.467	.822	.190	.356	110	73	17	1	19	19.5%	10.2%

1B Justin Smoak

	PA	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	wOBA	Hits	1B	2B	3B	HR	K%	BB%
RW23	522	.246	.359	.485	.844	.239	.362	108	55	26	1	25	23.3%	13.8%

2B Keston Hiura

	PA	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	wOBA	Hits	1B	2B	3B	HR	K%	BB%
RW23	603	.269	.331	.510	.841	.241	.357	148	77	39	3	29	28.5%	6.4%

SS Luis Urias

	PA	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	wOBA	Hits	1B	2B	3B	HR	K%	BB%
RW23	522	.237	.333	.368	.701	.131	.311	108	72	23	3	10	21.2%	10.3%

3B Eric Sogard

	PA	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	wOBA	Hits	1B	2B	3B	HR	K%	BB%
RW23	410	.269	.339	.386	.725	.117	.320	99	71	19	1	7	14.8%	9.3%

OF Ryan Braun

	PA	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	wOBA	Hits	1B	2B	3B	HR	K%	BB%
RW23	485	.273	.323	.469	.792	.197	.338	122	76	25	1	20	21.2%	6.5%

OF Lorenzo Cain

	PA	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	wOBA	Hits	1B	2B	3B	HR	K%	BB%
RW23	590	.275	.350	.388	.737	.112	.325	145	108	25	1	11	17.4%	9.2%

OF Christian Yelich

	PA	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	wOBA	Hits	1B	2B	3B	HR	K%	BB%
RW23	675	.317	.407	.604	1.011	.287	.422	184	105	34	4	42	20.6%	12.2%

OF Avisail Garcia

	PA	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	wOBA	Hits	1B	2B	3B	HR	K%	BB%
RW23	445	.263	.314	.452	.766	.189	.329	108	69	20	1	19	24.1%	6.3%

OF Ben Gamel 

	PA	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	wOBA	Hits	1B	2B	3B	HR	K%	BB%
RW23	192	.256	.343	.390	.733	.134	.324	43	29	10	1	4	26.5%	10.8%

SS Orlando Arcia

	PA	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	wOBA	Hits	1B	2B	3B	HR	K%	BB%
RW23	308	.240	.293	.366	.659	.125	.289	68	49	10	1	8	22.3%	6.8%

INF Jedd Gyorko

	PA	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	wOBA	Hits	1B	2B	3B	HR	K%	BB%
RW23	339	.231	.299	.372	.671	.141	.295	70	47	13	1	9	22.1%	8.6%

C Manny Pina

	PA	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	wOBA	Hits	1B	2B	3B	HR	K%	BB%
RW23	300	.240	.307	.394	.701	.154	.308	65	43	12	0	10	22.5%	7.5%

INF Ryon Healy

	PA	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	wOBA	Hits	1B	2B	3B	HR	K%	BB%
RW23	220	.253	.302	.476	.778	.223	.333	51	29	10	1	11	21.7%	6.3%

INF Ronny Rodriguez

	PA	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	wOBA	Hits	1B	2B	3B	HR	K%	BB%
RW23	119	.224	.260	.381	.641	.158	.277	25	16	4	1	4	26.4%	4.5%

The 2019 season came to an end for the Milwaukee Brewers after one playoff game. The Brewers choked away a late lead in the National League Wild Card winner-take-all showdown and were sent home packing a year after being one win away from a World Series berth. Overall it was a disappointing campaign for Milwaukee. They had too much talent to just disappear after a single game, though they were lucky to even make the playoffs in the first place.

Because the Brewers season is over, it’s time to look back at the preseason projections and see where the models went wrong and where they went right. So let’s review the season by looking over the pitcher projections from The First Out At Third’s own system (RW23), Steamer, and ZiPS. In 2017 — RW23’s debut season — RW23 was fairly accurate with its hitter projections, while it struggled with pitchers. I only projected hitters in 2018 due to a computer malfunction, and RW23 fell behind Steamer and ZiPS. It’ll be interesting to see how well RW23 holds its own in its third season.

You can find the original 2019 pitcher projections here.

*Note: I originally projected Corey Knebel, Taylor Williams and Alex Wilson, but chose not to include them below due to the limited — or zero — time spent with the Brewers.

RHP Jhoulys Chacin

	IP	ERA	FIP	XFIP	WHIP	K/9	BB/9	HR/9	K%	BB%
RW23	185	3.80	4.38	4.43	1.30	7.33	3.46	1.04	19.1%	9.0%
Steamer	180	4.66	4.61	4.46	1.42	7.60	3.33	1.30	19.2%	8.4%
ZiPS	166	4.33	4.56	—	1.37	7.25	3.63	1.14	—	—
Actual	103	6.01	5.88	5.03	1.56	8.80	2.18	2.18	21.5%	9.8%

Winner: Steamer

Chacin had a miserable season for the Brewers and continued his forgettable performance when he signed with the Red Sox after his release. Steamer was most down on the righty going into the season, and therefore deserves the win.

RHP Freddy Peralta

	IP	ERA	FIP	XFIP	WHIP	K/9	BB/9	HR/9	K%	BB%
RW23	114	4.09	4.50	4.37	1.38	10.65	5.03	1.28	27.3%	12.9%
Steamer	127	4.35	4.36	4.27	1.38	10.49	4.62	1.29	26.7%	11.8%
ZiPS	132	4.01	4.10	—	1.35	12.11	5.10	1.22	—	—
Actual	85	5.29	4.18	4.15	1.46	12.18	3.92	1.59	30.1%	9.7%

Winner: ZiPS

Like Chacin, all three projection systems had a difficult time projecting the flame-throwing Peralta, but in the end, ZiPS was most accurate. Peralta began the year in the rotation (7.07 ERA) before transitioning to the bullpen (4.01 ERA). It’ll be interesting to see how the Brewers use him in 2020.

RHP Brandon Woodruff

	IP	ERA	FIP	XFIP	WHIP	K/9	BB/9	HR/9	K%	BB%
RW23	122	3.73	3.68	3.87	1.32	8.71	3.38	0.83	22.7%	8.8%
Steamer	133	4.39	4.36	4.17	1.37	8.24	3.41	1.22	21.0%	8.7%
ZiPS	117	4.21	4.16	—	1.36	8.57	3.59	1.07	—	—
Actual	121	3.62	3.01	3.36	1.14	10.58	2.22	0.89	29.0%	6.1%

Winner: RW23

As you”ll see, RW23 was higher on Milwaukee’s pitchers — especially the young arms like Woodruff — than Steamer and ZiPS were. And in this case, RW23 was correct about Woodruff. He broke out in a big way in 2019 and is set to headline the team’s rotation next season and in years to come.

RHP Corbin Burnes

	IP	ERA	FIP	XFIP	WHIP	K/9	BB/9	HR/9	K%	BB%
RW23	124	3.64	3.74	3.84	1.29	8.87	3.26	0.85	23.1%	8.5%
Steamer	134	4.48	4.44	4.24	1.39	8.23	3.54	1.24	20.9%	9.0%
ZiPS	135	3.92	4.12	—	1.3	8.71	3.26	1.13	—	—
Actual	49	8.82	6.09	3.37	1.84	12.86	3.67	3.12	29.8%	8.5%

Winner: N/A

After a dominant performance out of the bullpen in 2018, Burnes was a disaster this season, giving up home run after home run. RW23 was incredibly high on Burnes coming into the year, and personally, I still like him, but he’ll need to fix his fastball location issues. No projection system gets the win here.

RHP Zach Davies

	IP	ERA	FIP	XFIP	WHIP	K/9	BB/9	HR/9	K%	BB%
RW23	150	4.09	4.23	4.12	1.36	7.02	3.02	1.01	18.1%	7.8%
Steamer	119	4.62	4.48	4.28	1.41	7.06	2.72	1.29	17.7%	6.8%
ZiPS	145	4.26	4.34	—	1.35	6.73	2.78	1.11	—	—
Actual	159	3.55	4.56	5.20	1.29	5.75	2.87	1.13	15.2%	7.6%

Winner: RW23

For the fourth time in his five big-league seasons, Davies posted a sub-4.00 ERA despite nasty peripherals. RW23 takes home the win because it took into account that while Davies doesn’t strikeout many hitters, he has a knack for limiting hard contact, which allows him to beat his peripherals.

RHP Jimmy Nelson

	IP	ERA	FIP	XFIP	WHIP	K/9	BB/9	HR/9	K%	BB%
RW23	119	3.67	3.60	3.45	1.27	9.40	2.86	0.93	24.6%	7.5%
Steamer	75	4.14	3.98	3.85	1.30	8.73	2.97	1.11	22.7%	7.7%
ZiPS	121	4.30	4.47	—	1.38	7.94	3.41	1.19	—	—
Actual	22	6.95	5.80	5.34	1.91	10.64	6.95	1.64	24.8%	16.2%

Winner: N/A

Nelson was nearly impossible to project heading into the season. We didn’t know his health situation and what is role would be if he returned. He made three starts and made seven relief appearances, all the while struggling with control. He definitely didn’t look like the Nelson of old. Hopefully, he has a completely healthy offseason and we’ll be able to project him more accurately in 2020.

RHP Chase Anderson

	IP	ERA	FIP	XFIP	WHIP	K/9	BB/9	HR/9	K%	BB%
RW23	83	4.27	4.83	4.52	1.30	7.91	3.28	1.53	20.7%	8.6%
Steamer	116	4.63	4.58	4.40	1.32	8.36	2.72	1.55	21.4%	7.0%
ZiPS	141	4.47	5.13	—	1.35	7.28	3.19	1.66	—	—
Actual	139	4.21	4.83	5.26	1.27	8.03	3.24	1.49	21.0%	8.5%

Winner: RW23

RW23 hit Anderson’s projection right on the nose with it’s most accurate projection yet, giving it the easy win. Anderson was who he’s mainly always been; a reliable and innings-eating pitcher. The Brewers just recently traded him to the Toronto Blue Jays in exchange for Chad Spanberger.

LHP Josh Hader

	IP	ERA	FIP	XFIP	WHIP	K/9	BB/9	HR/9	K%	BB%
RW23	74	2.37	2.87	2.63	0.91	13.91	3.46	1.06	40.2%	10.0%
Steamer	65	2.92	2.94	2.97	1.10	13.65	3.84	0.99	36.9%	10.4%
ZiPS	73	2.95	3.08	—	1.10	15.34	4.30	1.23	—	—
Actual	75	2.62	3.10	2.36	0.81	16.41	2.38	1.78	47.8%	6.9%

Winner: ZiPS

Hader continued to strike every one out, but he also started giving up home runs at a high rate, which is why he set career highs in ERA and FIP. ZiPS deserves the win for accurately projecting Hader’s batted ball issues.

RHP Jeremy Jeffress

	IP	ERA	FIP	XFIP	WHIP	K/9	BB/9	HR/9	K%	BB%
RW23	59	3.39	3.50	3.27	1.26	9.73	3.62	0.83	25.8%	9.6%
Steamer	40	3.38	3.40	3.34	1.28	9.59	3.35	0.78	25.2%	8.8%
ZiPS	66	3.12	3.36	—	1.25	9.23	3.53	0.68	—	—
Actual	52	5.02	3.96	4.40	1.37	7.96	2.94	0.87	20.4%	7.6%

Winner: N/A

No winners here once again. This is getting annoying. But how can I declare a winner when nobody projected Jeffress would implode? Jeffress dealt with injuries in spring training and throughout the year, and that contributed to a decrease in fastball velocity and fewer strikeouts. The Brewers released him in September.

LHP Alex Claudio

	IP	ERA	FIP	XFIP	WHIP	K/9	BB/9	HR/9	K%	BB%
RW23	71	3.06	2.97	2.98	1.15	6.43	1.21	0.51	17.5%	3.3%
Steamer	60	3.57	3.59	3.53	1.31	6.80	2.24	0.75	17.7%	5.8%
ZiPS	75	3.33	3.44	—	1.2	5.83	1.78	0.59	—	—
Actual	62	4.06	4.92	4.59	1.31	6.39	3.48	1.16	16.5%	9.0%

Winner: Steamer

Claudio led all relievers in appearances with 83, but he failed to be the pitcher the Brewers hoped he would be. RW23 was hoping Claudio would recapture his magic from 2017, but instead he pitched similar to 2018. Steamer adds another to the win column.

RHP Matt Albers

	IP	ERA	FIP	XFIP	WHIP	K/9	BB/9	HR/9	K%	BB%
RW23	53	4.26	4.22	3.98	1.36	8.40	3.07	1.19	21.6%	7.9%
Steamer	65	4.18	4.11	3.96	1.33	8.35	2.93	1.17	21.4%	7.5%
ZiPS	41	4.35	4.49	—	1.28	8.49	2.61	1.52	—	—
Actual	59	5.13	4.66	4.55	1.37	8.60	4.37	1.21	22.1%	11.2%

Winner: ZiPS

Albers’ terrible tenure as a Milwaukee Brewer is finally over, as the two-year deal he signed turned out to be one of the worst moves by general manager David Stearns. Albers is a free agent and will likely sign a prove-it deal with a rebuilding team. ZiPS was closest on Albers’ poor production.

RHP Jacob Barnes

	IP	ERA	FIP	XFIP	WHIP	K/9	BB/9	HR/9	K%	BB%
RW23	55	3.50	3.61	3.82	1.33	8.61	3.98	0.68	22.5%	10.4%
Steamer	35	4.04	4.04	3.97	1.38	8.97	3.84	1.03	22.9%	9.8%
ZiPS	61	3.65	3.74	—	1.38	8.90	4.23	0.73	—	—
Actual	32	7.44	6.06	5.22	1.78	8.82	6.06	1.93	20.0%	13.8%

Winner: N/A

Another pitcher who imploded for the Brewers and another contest that has no winner. The Brewers designated Barnes for assignment in August and the Royals just released him. He has talent, but his command is limiting his success.

RHP Junior Guerra

	IP	ERA	FIP	XFIP	WHIP	K/9	BB/9	HR/9	K%	BB%
RW23	41	4.03	4.28	4.00	1.28	8.72	3.07	1.34	23.0%	8.1%
Steamer	60	3.86	3.84	3.81	1.25	9.71	3.03	1.19	25.4%	7.9%
ZiPS	119	4.46	4.72	—	1.39	8.09	3.86	1.36	—	—
Actual	83	3.55	4.52	4.83	1.12	8.28	3.87	1.18	22.4%	10.5%

Winner: RW23

This was close between RW23 and Steamer, but RW23 was just a little more accurate in more categories. Guerra produced a nice season and eventually became one of Craig Counsell‘s most trusted bullpen arms. He seems to have found his spot as a reliever.

FINAL RESULTS:

RW23: 4 wins

ZiPS: 3 wins

Steamer: 2 wins

The 2019 season came to an end for the Milwaukee Brewers after one playoff game. The Brewers choked away a late lead in the National League Wild Card winner-take-all showdown and were sent home packing a year after being one win away from a World Series berth. Overall it was a disappointing campaign for Milwaukee. They had too much talent to just disappear after a single game, though they were lucky to even make the playoffs in the first place.

Because the Brewers season is over, it’s time to look back at the preseason projections and see where the models went wrong and where they went right. So let’s review the season by looking over the projections from The First Out At Third’s own system (RW23), Steamer, and ZiPS. In 2017 — RW23’s debut season — RW23 was fairly accurate with its hitter projections, while it struggled with pitchers. I only projected hitters in 2018 due to a computer malfunction, and RW23 fell behind Steamer and ZiPS. It’ll be interesting to see how well RW23 holds its own in its third season.

You can find the original 2019 hitter projections here.

C Yasmani Grandal

	PA	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	wOBA	HR	K%	BB%	BABIP
RW23	532	.247	.355	.487	.842	.240	.361	28	24.0%	14.1%	.280
Steamer	496	.237	.344	.453	.797	.216	.345	23	25.0%	13.5%	.277
ZiPS	475	.238	.349	.462	.811	.223	.351	23	25.7%	14.3%	.281
Actual	632	.246	.380	.468	.848	.222	.361	28	22.0%	17.2%	.279

Winner: RW23

RW23 accurately projected Grandal’s weighted on-base average and number of home runs, while nailing his batting average and OPS. RW23 is the clear winner here, as is Grandal after a fantastic season.

1B Jesus Aguilar

	PA	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	WOBA	HR	K%	BB%	BABIP
RW23	595	.258	.329	.480	.810	.223	.346	30	27.2%	8.8%	.309
Steamer	578	.242	.317	.454	.771	.212	.330	28	26.4%	9.1%	.286
ZiPS	526	.258	.333	.492	.825	.234	.350	28	25.3%	9.5%	.297
Actual	369	.236	.325	.389	.714	.153	.307	12	22.0%	11.7%	.272

Winner: N/A

The three projection systems all failed to predict Aguilar’s offensive fall. The Brewers ultimately traded him to the Tampa Bay Rays, and while he hit better, his power from 2018 remained gone. No winners here.

2B/3B Mike Moustakas

	PA	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	WOBA	HR	K%	BB%	BABIP
RW23	603	.269	.330	.508	.838	.239	.356	34	16.6%	8.1%	.270
Steamer	575	.261	.321	.489	.809	.228	.342	30	16.5%	7.5%	.264
ZiPS	580	.267	.324	.506	.818	.239	.350	32	16.2%	7.1%	.268
Actual	584	.254	.329	.516	.845	.262	.348	35	16.8%	9.1%	.250

Winner: RW23

It was a tight race, but RW23 comes away with a narrow victory, due to it more accurately projecting Moustakas’ power numbers. Playing a full year at Miller Park sure helped his power, as Moustakas’ 35 home runs were the second most of his career.

3B Travis Shaw

	PA	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	WOBA	HR	K%	BB%	BABIP
RW23	595	.282	.376	.534	.910	.252	.386	34	19.0%	12.9%	.298
Steamer	598	.249	.334	.457	.791	.209	.338	27	21.3%	10.8%	.276
ZiPS	560	.261	.340	.472	.812	.219	.346	26	21.4%	11.1%	.282
Actual	270	.157	.281	.270	.551	.113	.248	7	33.0%	13.3%	.216

Winner: N/A

Let’s forget I predicted Shaw would make the All-Star roster this year. Let’s just wipe that from our memories because this was a lost season for Shaw. He spent a lot of time in the minors and looked completely lost when he was with the Brewers. No one foresaw this kind of downfall. Nobody’s a winner.

SS Orlando Arcia

	PA	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	WOBA	HR	K%	BB%	BABIP
RW23	552	.245	.293	.357	.650	.112	.286	11	22.9%	6.2%	.303
Steamer	507	.253	.302	.377	.679	.123	.293	10	19.4%	6.2%	.299
ZiPS	553	.247	.294	.360	.654	.113	.283	10	21.3%	6.0%	.302
Actual	546	.223	.283	.350	.633	.128	.269	15	20.0%	7.9%	.253

Winner: RW23

Arcia was the worst hitter in baseball in 2019, and it may be time to question if his bat will ever play at a league-average level. RW23 takes home another win, though it was extremely close to being a three-way tie.

OF Ryan Braun

	PA	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	WOBA	HR	K%	BB%	BABIP
RW23	460	.270	.331	.493	.824	.222	.351	20	19.8%	8.0%	.300
Steamer	507	.265	.330	.476	.807	.212	.342	23	19.6%	8.4%	.290
ZiPS	440	.269	.332	.470	.802	.201	.340	18	19.5%	8.2%	.300
Actual	508	.285	.343	.505	.849	.220	.354	22	20.7%	6.7%	.325

Winner: RW23

Another win for RW23, as Braun enjoyed a offensive resurgence. Steamer and ZiPS underestimated his power numbers, giving RW23 the clear and decisive victory.

OF Lorenzo Cain

	PA	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	wOBA	HR	K%	BB%	BABIP
RW23	600	.296	.372	.424	.796	.128	.349	12	15.8%	10.3%	.339
Steamer	620	.284	.356	.422	.778	.138	.339	14	16.9%	9.2%	.327
ZiPS	568	.287	.359	.409	.768	.123	.336	11	16.2%	9.3%	.330
Actual	623	.260	.325	.372	.697	.112	.302	11	17.0%	8.0%	.301

Winner: ZiPS

This contest was close between ZiPS and Steamer, though neither projection system saw Cain’s offense falling as much as it did. Cain dealt with injuries throughout the season and was nowhere near the hitter he was for the Brewers in 2018. The Brewers will need him to bounce back in a big way.

OF Christian Yelich

	PA	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	WOBA	HR	K%	BB%	BABIP
RW23	662	.310	.390	.544	.934	.234	.397	29	20.5%	11.0%	.360
Steamer	637	.297	.381	.515	.896	.218	.382	26	20.5%	11.2%	.344
ZiPS	673	.298	.379	.522	.901	.224	.384	28	21.1%	10.8%	.349
Actual	580	.329	.429	.671	1.100	.342	.442	44	20.3%	13.8%	.355

Winner: RW23

All three projection systems thought Yelich would regress in 2019, a word Yelich grew to hate. And Yelich proved everyone wrong, as he set career marks in almost every offensive category. RW23 picks up another victory here, due to its more bullish projection.

1B Eric Thames

	PA	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	WOBA	HR	K%	BB%	BABIP
RW23	340	.232	.316	.478	.794	.246	.342	19	32.3%	10.0%	.295
Steamer	258	.235	.329	.459	.788	.224	.336	12	30.3%	11.2%	.299
ZiPS	427	.229	.333	.478	.818	.256	.346	23	32.3%	12.2%	.293
Actual	459	.247	.346	.505	.851	.258	.354	25	30.5%	11.1%	.313

Winner: ZiPS

Because Aguilar forgot how to hit, Thames saw more playing time and eventually took over the starting job completely when Aguilar was traded. As a result, put together a very solid season. His wRC+ of 116 was well above league average and his on-base skills returned after dipping a bit in 2018. However, he’s now on the free agent market after the Brewers declined his $7.5 million option. ZiPS takes home the win here, as it believed in Thames’ 2017 performance more than his 2018 performance.

OF Ben Gamel

	PA	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	WOBA	HR	K%	BB%	BABIP
RW23	322	.272	.346	.416	.762	.144	.332	6	19.7%	9.5%	.330
Steamer	110	.267	.333	.393	.725	.126	.316	2	20.9%	8.5%	.330
ZiPS	530	.267	.331	.413	.744	.146	.322	9	20.4%	8.3%	.326
Actual	356	.248	.337	.373	.710	.125	.308	7	29.2%	11.2%	.347

Winner: Steamer

Steamer is finally on the board! Gamel turned out to be a nice bench piece for the Brewers, but he showed little extra-base power and his strikeouts skyrocketed. He should likely resume is bench role next season.

INF Hernan Perez

	PA	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	WOBA	HR	K%	BB%	BABIP
RW23	295	.254	.288	.398	.686	.143	.297	9	21.6%	4.6%	.301
Steamer	216	.253	.290	.394	.685	.141	.295	5	20.0%	4.9%	.294
ZiPS	415	.255	.286	.401	.687	.145	.294	11	20.5%	4.3%	.298
Actual	246	.228	.262	.379	.642	.151	.271	8	26.8%	4.5%	.283

Winner: Three-way tie

The projections were so similar to each other that it’s basically impossible to pick a sole winner, so I’ve giving the victory to all three projection systems. Perez isn’t fun to project and he’s not fun to watch, so it makes sense.

INF Cory Spangenberg

	PA	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	WOBA	HR	K%	BB%	BABIP
RW23	252	.264	.328	.426	.753	.162	.328	8	27.1%	8.0%	.339
Steamer	75	.245	.306	.383	.688	.138	.300	2	28.4%	7.4%	.328
ZiPS	461	.246	.306	.406	.712	.160	.308	13	30.4%	7.2%	.337
Actual	102	.232	.277	.358	.635	.126	.267	2	35.3%	5.9%	.351

Winner: Steamer

Steamer takes home an easy victory here by correctly predicting Spangenberg’s role and low power numbers. Spangenberg is a free agent and will likely move on from Milwaukee.

C Manny Pina

	PA	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	WOBA	HR	K%	BB%	BABIP
RW23	261	.239	.303	.365	.668	.126	.293	6	19.0%	6.7%	.281
Steamer	96	.250	.306	.388	.694	.138	.301	2	20.4%	6.6%	.296
ZiPS	334	.247	.303	.385	.688	.138	.297	8	19.2%	6.3%	.285
Actual	179	.228	.313	.411	.724	.184	.308	7	27.9%	8.9%	.284

Winner: Steamer

Steamer’s projected plate appearances for Pina were far too low, but everything else was relatively on point, earning it a victory. Pina will return to the Brewers in 2020, though his role — with Grandal’s likely departure — is yet to be determined.

FINAL RESULTS:

RW23: 6 wins

Steamer: 4 wins

ZiPS: 3 wins

Welcome to the 2019 edition of the RW23 hitter projections for the Milwaukee Brewers. RW23 — creatively named after Rickie Weeks — was created in 2017 with the help of Mike Podhorzer and his book, “Projecting X 2.0: How to Forecast Baseball Player Performance.”

Below you’ll find the RW23 pitcher projections for the 2019 Milwaukee Brewers, along with the Steamer and ZiPS projection systems for comparison. Remember projections are just projections, and RW23 is significantly more bullish on Milwaukee’s starting pitching staff than Steamer and ZiPS. Don’t take any of these projection systems as fact. But feel free to bash them in the comments section.

You can find my previously published hitter projections here.

RHP Jhoulys Chacin

	IP	ERA	FIP	xFIP	WHIP	K/9	BB/9	HR/9	K%	BB%
RW23	185.0	3.80	4.38	4.43	1.30	7.33	3.46	1.04	19.1%	9.0%
Steamer	180.0	4.66	4.61	4.46	1.42	7.60	3.33	1.30	19.2%	8.4%
ZiPS	166.0	4.33	4.56	—	1.37	7.25	3.63	1.14	—	—

RHP Freddy Peralta

	IP	ERA	FIP	xFIP	WHIP	K/9	BB/9	HR/9	K%	BB%
RW23	114.0	4.09	4.50	4.37	1.38	10.65	5.03	1.28	27.3%	12.9%
Steamer	127.0	4.35	4.36	4.27	1.38	10.49	4.62	1.29	26.7%	11.8%
ZiPS	132.0	4.01	4.10	—	1.35	12.11	5.10	1.22	—	—

RHP Brandon Woodruff

	IP	ERA	FIP	xFIP	WHIP	K/9	BB/9	HR/9	K%	BB%
RW23	122.0	3.73	3.68	3.87	1.32	8.71	3.38	0.83	22.7%	8.8%
Steamer	133.0	4.39	4.36	4.17	1.37	8.24	3.41	1.22	21.0%	8.7%
ZiPS	117.0	4.21	4.16	—	1.36	8.57	3.59	1.07	—	—

RHP Corbin Burnes

	IP	ERA	FIP	xFIP	WHIP	K/9	BB/9	HR/9	K%	BB%
RW23	124.0	3.64	3.74	3.84	1.29	8.87	3.26	0.85	23.1%	8.5%
Steamer	134.0	4.48	4.44	4.24	1.39	8.23	3.54	1.24	20.9%	9.0%
ZiPS	135.0	3.92	4.12	—	1.30	8.71	3.26	1.13	—	—

RHP Zach Davies

	IP	ERA	FIP	xFIP	WHIP	K/9	BB/9	HR/9	K%	BB%
RW23	150.0	4.09	4.23	4.12	1.36	7.02	3.02	1.01	18.1%	7.8%
Steamer	119.0	4.62	4.48	4.28	1.41	7.06	2.72	1.29	17.7%	6.8%
ZiPS	145.0	4.26	4.34	—	1.35	6.73	2.78	1.11	—	—

RHP Jimmy Nelson

	IP	ERA	FIP	xFIP	WHIP	K/9	BB/9	HR/9	K%	BB%
RW23	119.0	3.67	3.60	3.45	1.27	9.40	2.86	0.93	24.6%	7.5%
Steamer	75.0	4.14	3.98	3.85	1.30	8.73	2.97	1.11	22.7%	7.7%
ZiPS	121.0	4.30	4.47	—	1.38	7.94	3.41	1.19	—	—

RHP Chase Anderson

	IP	ERA	FIP	xFIP	WHIP	K/9	BB/9	HR/9	K%	BB%
RW23	83.0	4.27	4.83	4.52	1.30	7.91	3.28	1.53	20.7%	8.6%
Steamer	116.0	4.63	4.58	4.40	1.32	8.36	2.72	1.55	21.4%	7.0%
ZiPS	141.0	4.47	5.13	—	1.35	7.28	3.19	1.66	—	—

LHP Josh Hader

	IP	ERA	FIP	xFIP	WHIP	K/9	BB/9	HR/9	K%	BB%
RW23	74.0	2.37	2.87	2.63	0.91	13.91	3.46	1.06	40.2%	10.0%
Steamer	65.0	2.92	2.94	2.97	1.10	13.65	3.84	0.99	36.9%	10.4%
ZiPS	73.0	2.95	3.08	—	1.10	15.34	4.30	1.23	—	—

RHP Jeremy Jeffress

	IP	ERA	FIP	xFIP	WHIP	K/9	BB/9	HR/9	K%	BB%
RW23	59.0	3.39	3.50	3.27	1.26	9.73	3.62	0.83	25.8%	9.6%
Steamer	40.0	3.38	3.40	3.34	1.28	9.59	3.35	0.78	25.2%	8.8%
ZiPS	66.0	3.12	3.36	—	1.25	9.23	3.53	0.68	—	—

LHP Alex Claudio

	IP	ERA	FIP	xFIP	WHIP	K/9	BB/9	HR/9	K%	BB%
RW23	71.0	3.06	2.97	2.98	1.15	6.43	1.21	0.51	17.5%	3.3%
Steamer	60.0	3.57	3.59	3.53	1.31	6.80	2.24	0.75	17.7%	5.8%
ZiPS	75.0	3.33	3.44	—	1.20	5.83	1.78	0.59	—	—

RHP Matt Albers

	IP	ERA	FIP	xFIP	WHIP	K/9	BB/9	HR/9	K%	BB%
RW23	53.0	4.26	4.22	3.98	1.36	8.40	3.07	1.19	21.6%	7.9%
Steamer	65.0	4.18	4.11	3.96	1.33	8.35	2.93	1.17	21.4%	7.5%
ZiPS	41.0	4.35	4.49	—	1.28	8.49	2.61	1.52	—	—

RHP Corey Knebel

	IP	ERA	FIP	xFIP	WHIP	K/9	BB/9	HR/9	K%	BB%
RW23	39.0	2.98	2.89	2.95	1.16	12.61	3.76	0.81	34.2%	10.2%
Steamer	20.0	3.03	2.95	2.97	1.15	12.85	3.73	0.88	34.4%	10.0%
ZiPS	62.0	2.90	3.06	—	1.16	13.79	4.06	1.02	—	—

RHP Taylor Williams

	IP	ERA	FIP	xFIP	WHIP	K/9	BB/9	HR/9	K%	BB%
RW23	49.0	3.98	3.85	3.85	1.36	9.76	8.76	1.03	25.3%	10.0%
Steamer	40.0	4.07	4.06	4.01	1.34	9.74	3.79	1.17	25.0%	9.7%
ZiPS	56.0	4.34	4.21	—	1.48	9.32	4.34	1.13	—	—

RHP Jacob Barnes

	IP	ERA	FIP	xFIP	WHIP	K/9	BB/9	HR/9	K%	BB%
RW23	55.0	3.50	3.61	3.82	1.33	8.61	3.98	0.68	22.5%	10.4%
Steamer	35.0	4.04	4.04	3.97	1.38	8.97	3.84	1.03	22.9%	9.8%
ZiPS	61.0	3.65	3.74	—	1.38	8.90	4.23	0.73	—	—

RHP Junior Guerra

	IP	ERA	FIP	xFIP	WHIP	K/9	BB/9	HR/9	K%	BB%
RW23	41.0	4.03	4.28	4.00	1.28	8.72	3.07	1.34	23.0%	8.1%
Steamer	60.0	3.86	3.84	3.81	1.25	9.71	3.03	1.19	25.4%	7.9%
ZiPS	119.0	4.46	4.72	—	1.39	8.09	3.86	1.36	—	—

RHP Alex Wilson

	IP	ERA	FIP	xFIP	WHIP	K/9	BB/9	HR/9	K%	BB%
RW23	52.0	3.99	3.96	4.31	1.35	6.97	2.81	0.92	18.1%	7.3%
Steamer	20.0	4.18	4.12	4.07	1.32	7.66	2.53	1.18	19.7%	6.5%
ZiPS	58.0	3.88	3.95	—	1.24	6.21	2.17	0.93	—	—

 

Phew.

What a season. What an incredible, outta-this-world fun and heart-wrenching season the 2018 campaign turned out to be. When Mike Moustakas swung and missed on a pitch in the dirt from Clayton Kershaw to end the Milwaukee Brewers’ Cinderella story, I was broken, and yet, so thrilled and happy I was able to witness playoff baseball in Miller Park once again.

With that being said, I needed time away from the Brewers and from baseball, which is why this site has been silent for awhile. I needed to process what happened and I needed to decompress. That’s over with now. I’m ready to start thinking and writing about the Milwaukee Brewers again.

So let’s review the season by looking over the preseason projections from The First Out At Third’s own system (RW23), Steamer and ZiPS. In 2017, RW23 was fairly accurate with its hitter projections, while it struggled with pitchers. My computer took a dive just before the season started, so I was unable to project hurlers this year, though I did manage to get my hitter projections out to the world. Let’s see how they stacked up against the powerhouses of Steamer and ZiPs.

***Note: My preseason projections included Jonathan Villar, Eric Sogard, Domingo Santana, Jett Bandy and Stephen Vogt, but because Villar was traded, Sogard, Santana and Bandy barely spent any time with the team and Vogt missed the entire season, I decided not to include them below. If you have issues with this decision, take it up with the league office.

C Manny Pina

	PA	AB	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	WOBA	K%	BB%	BABIP	SB	HR
RW23	333	304	.245	.301	.370	.671	.125	.295	23.1%	6.4%	.299	1	8
Steamer	231	210	.251	.306	.388	.694	.137	.300	20.5%	6.5%	.297	1	5
ZiPS	339	311	.248	.299	.386	.685	.138	.295	19.5%	5.9%	.288	2	8
Actual	337	306	.252	.307	.395	.702	.144	.301	18.4%	6.2%	.285	2	9

Winner: Steamer

All three projection systems foresaw Pina’s fall back to earth after a career year in 2017. Steamer just happened to be a bit more spot on than RW23 and ZiPS. It remains to be seen if Pina will be Milwaukee’s starting backstop in 2018, though one should expect him to be on the 25-man roster.

1B Eric Thames

	PA	AB	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	WOBA	K%	BB%	BABIP	SB	HR
RW23	489	419	.243	.348	.499	.846	.256	.363	30.2%	12.8%	.306	4	26
Steamer	508	437	.251	.346	.488	.834	.236	.352	27.2%	11.5%	.309	6	26
ZiPS	516	441	.240	.345	.510	.855	.270	.358	30.6%	12.6%	.300	7	29
Actual	278	247	.219	.306	.478	.783	.259	.330	34.9%	10.4%	.284	7	16

Winner: N/A

Thames lost playing time to Jesus Aguilar soon after the season started, and he proved he wasn’t a reliable option off the bench, highlighted by the fact the Brewers refused to put him on their postseason roster. Thames looked lost at the plate all year, and none of the projection systems saw it coming. There’s no winners here.

3B/2B Travis Shaw

	PA	AB	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	WOBA	K%	BB%	BABIP	SB	HR
RW23	595	527	.277	.353	.535	.888	.258	.376	23.2%	10.1%	.315	9	33
Steamer	580	516	.249	.323	.454	.777	.205	.328	23.4%	9.3%	.286	5	26
ZiPS	573	515	.256	.323	.472	.795	.216	.335	23.2%	8.6%	.294	7	26
Actual	587	498	.241	.345	.480	.825	.239	.351	18.4%	13.3%	.242	5	32

Winner: ZiPS

Though RW23 was correct in projecting that Shaw was capable of putting up similar — if not better — power numbers to 2017, it was a little too bullish on the Brewers infielder, giving ZiPS its first win. Shaw was the victim of some BABIP bad luck, and I expect his average and OBP to rise in 2019.

SS Orlando Arcia

	PA	AB	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	WOBA	K%	BB%	BABIP	SB	HR
RW23	592	544	.278	.331	.431	.762	.152	.326	16.9%	7.0%	.312	15	17
Steamer	551	503	.262	.313	.405	.717	.143	.305	17.5%	6.7%	.296	14	14
ZiPS	599	554	.256	.305	.401	.706	.144	.299	18.2%	6.3%	.292	16	16
Actual	366	348	.236	.268	.307	.576	.072	.253	23.8%	4.1%	.305	7	3

Winner: ZiPS

We can just copy what I wrote about Thames and paste it here, because, boy, Arcia was just a bag of off-balanced swings during the regular season. He turned it on in October, but that doesn’t erase his miserable six months prior to that. Once again, RW23 hyped up Arcia, and while Steamer and ZiPS didn’t think he’d be this dreadful, the win goes to the latter.

OF Ryan Braun

	PA	AB	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	WOBA	K%	BB%	BABIP	SB	HR
RW23	475	428	.280	.345	.490	.835	.210	.356	18.3%	8.6%	.308	7	20
Steamer	475	426	.277	.344	.496	.840	.219	.353	19.3%	8.8%	.304	10	22
ZiPS	472	426	.284	.347	.495	.843	.211	.354	18.9%	8.3%	.316	12	20
Actual	447	405	.254	.313	.469	.782	.215	.330	19.0%	7.6%	.274	11	20

Winner: ZiPS

A .313 on-base percentage for Braun is shocking, though his career-low .274 BABIP explains it a little. I didn’t want to give ZiPS the win here, as all three projection systems missed the mark again, but I guess ZiPS was the closest. I honestly have no idea.

OF Lorenzo Cain

	PA	AB	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	WOBA	K%	BB%	BABIP	SB	HR
RW23	610	553	.292	.350	.417	.767	.125	.334	17.6%	7.7%	.338	23	14
Steamer	593	533	.283	.344	.437	.781	.154	.335	17.7%	7.6%	.324	16	16
ZiPS	579	530	.283	.339	.426	.765	.143	.328	16.6%	7.1%	.322	22	14
Actual	620	539	.308	.395	.417	.813	.109	.359	15.2%	11.5%	.357	30	10

Winner: RW23

RW23 thought that Cain would be a force at the top of Milwaukee’s batting order, but Cain exceeded expectations in nearly every category, and earned himself a handful of MVP votes. Meanwhile, RW23 finally finds the win column.

OF Christian Yelich

	PA	AB	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	WOBA	K%	BB%	BABIP	SB	HR
RW23	672	580	.300	.386	.502	.889	.203	.382	20.2%	11.8%	.349	15	26
Steamer	647	560	.296	.381	.491	.871	.195	.371	20.2%	11.4%	.348	12	23
ZiPS	682	598	.289	.371	.472	.843	.182	.360	20.8%	11.1%	.346	16	21
Actual	651	574	.326	.402	.598	1.000	.272	.422	20.7%	10.4%	.373	22	36

Winner: RW23

The first convincing win for RW23, as it projected Yelich’s career year. The Brewers outfielder brought home the National League MVP and displayed a power force he never showed during his time in Miami. It seems rather unlikely Yelich can hit 36 home runs again in 2019, but is it really sane to put expectations on him anymore?

UTIL Hernan Perez

	PA	AB	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	WOBA	K%	BB%	BABIP	SB	HR
RW23	355	333	.273	.309	.430	.739	.157	.319	17.0%	5.1%	.300	8	12
Steamer	183	172	.258	.293	.398	.691	.141	.295	19.2%	4.5%	.298	6	5
ZiPS	474	446	.269	.299	.426	.725	.157	.307	18.1%	4.2%	.305	15	13
Actual	334	316	.253	.290	.386	.676	.133	.292	21.3%	5.1%	.300	11	9

Winner: Steamer

Perez had a typical Hernan Perez season. No walks and no on-base skills. There’s not much else to say about his season. I gave Steamer the win, despite being off on his playing time numbers.

1B Jesus Aguilar

	PA	AB	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	WOBA	K%	BB%	BABIP	SB	HR
RW23	82	74	.249	.314	.450	.764	.201	.330	28.8%	7.7%	.311	0	4
Steamer	20	18	.236	.302	.426	.728	.190	.310	26.5%	7.9%	.284	0	1
ZiPS	473	428	.243	.307	.428	.734	.185	.312	26.0%	7.8%	.293	0	19
Actual	566	492	.274	.352	.539	.890	.264	.374	25.3%	10.2%	.309	0	35

Winner: N/A

RW23 and Steamer didn’t think Aguilar would stick on the roster very long, and while ZiPS pegged him for a starting job, it vastly underestimated him as a hitter. Aguilar surprised everyone in baseball with his crushing of pitchers, and though he fell off in the second half, his season of 3.1 WAR was a tremendous success.

Final Results:

ZiPS: 3 wins

Steamer: 2 wins

RW23: 2 wins

The World Series is over (congratulations to World Series champion Mike Fiers) but for fans of the Milwaukee Brewers, the offseason began long ago. The Brewers missed the playoffs by an inch, and although playing in October would’ve been incredible, the season as a whole was a great success. I’ve said this before and I’ll say it again; the future is bright in Milwaukee. I fully believe this team is just a year or two away from being a perennial playoff team, something the Brewers have never really been.

But now that the season has ended, it’s time to revisit the projections by comparing my own system (RW23) that was created with the help of Mike Podhorzer and his book Projecting X 2.0, with popular projection systems Steamer and ZiPS. This was the first year I had ever created projections, and I’m curious to see how they held up.

Below you’ll find every Brewers pitcher I projected just before the season tipped off, along with Steamer and ZiPS projections, compared to said player’s actual 2017 statistical line. If you missed my hitter projection review, you can find it here.

***Note: My preseason projections included Tommy Milone, Jhan Marinez, Neftali Feliz and Taylor Jungmann, but because they were on the major league roster for such a short time, I chose not to include them below.

Junior Guerra

	IP	HR	WHIP	BABIP	K/9	BB/9	K%	BB%	ERA	FIP	XFIP
RW23	162	17	1.27	.281	7.48	3.25	19.8%	8.6%	3.61	3.99	4.35
Steamer	192	25	1.39	.303	8.24	3.47	21.0%	8.9%	4.43	4.29	4.25
ZiPS	123	18	1.35	.294	8.20	3.66	20.9%	9.3%	4.24	4.54	N/A
Actual	70.1	18	1.48	.236	8.57	5.50	21.3%	13.7%	5.12	6.58	5.43

Winner: Steamer

All three projection systems — especially RW23 — missed on Guerra’s meltdown in 2017, and while Steamer and ZiPS were equally accurate, neither really deserve a win here. Yet, I’m giving it to Steamer. Guerra will be 33 by the beginning of next season, and it seems like his time with Milwaukee is most likely finished. But at least we have his 2016 brilliance as a nice memory.

Zach Davies

	IP	HR	WHIP	BABIP	K/9	BB/9	K%	BB%	ERA	FIP	XFIP
RW23	168	22	1.32	.305	7.75	2.61	20.2%	6.8%	4.13	4.14	3.95
Steamer	174	23	1.36	.306	7.67	2.82	19.7%	7.3%	4.35	4.19	4.11
ZiPS	169	20	1.27	.307	7.76	2.55	20.2%	6.6%	3.99	3.91	N/A
Actual	191.1	20	1.35	.302	5.83	2.59	15.2%	6.7%	3.90	4.22	4.42

Winner: Steamer

RW23 should definitely get its props for being accurate, but Steamer still managed to edge out the win by just a hair. Once again, Davies outperformed his peripherals, while also finishing with the exact same BABIP and home runs allowed as he did in 2016. The 24 year old has proved he deserves to be in a major league rotation, even if most of his outs come in other ways than the strike out.

Jimmy Nelson

	IP	HR	WHIP	BABIP	K/9	BB/9	K%	BB%	ERA	FIP	XFIP
RW23	181	21	1.35	.296	7.83	3.47	20.1%	8.9%	4.02	4.27	4.16
Steamer	120	15	1.46	.308	7.39	3.64	18.5%	9.1%	4.80	4.57	4.48
ZiPS	170	21	1.38	.307	7.57	3.39	19.2%	8.6%	4.34	4.45	N/A
Actual	175.1	16	1.25	.340	10.21	2.46	27.3%	6.6%	3.49	3.05	3.15

Winner: RW23

Neither of the three systems were particularly close when it came to projecting Nelson, but RW23 was closer to predicting his success relative to Steamer and ZiPS. Nelson broke out in 2017, and despite a crazy .340 BABIP, posted the lowest ERA, FIP and xFIP of his career. It’s really a shame he’ll miss a significant amount of time next season.

Matt Garza

	IP	HR	WHIP	BABIP	K/9	BB/9	K%	BB%	ERA	FIP	XFIP
RW23	96	11	1.44	.303	6.05	3.18	15.4%	8.1%	4.45	4.46	4.53
Steamer	128	19	1.46	.308	6.54	3.06	16.5%	7.7%	4.89	4.71	4.57
ZiPS	122	18	1.43	.309	6.30	3.04	15.8%	7.6%	5.04	4.76	N/A
Actual	114.2	17	1.45	.287	6.20	3.53	15.7%	8.9%	4.94	4.91	5.12

Winner: ZiPS

ZiPS and Steamer were neck-and-neck, but I’m giving the slight edge to the former. Garza was dreadful once again, and his contract will go down as the worst free agent contract in Milwaukee Brewers franchise history. He’s now a free agent, but seeing how his last few seasons went, his career might be over. If so, he finishes a 12-year career with 23 WAR.

Wily Peralta

	IP	HR	WHIP	BABIP	K/9	BB/9	K%	BB%	ERA	FIP	XFIP
RW23	125	16	1.42	.310	6.66	2.94	17.0%	7.5%	4.49	4.37	4.09
Steamer	140	18	1.45	.312	6.93	3.12	17.5%	7.9%	4.64	4.43	4.26
ZiPS	149	22	1.43	.312	6.67	3.07	16.7%	7.7%	4.81	4.70	N/A
Actual	57.1	10	1.83	.362	8.16	5.02	19.3%	11.9%	7.85	5.34	4.96

Winner: N/A

Peralta was terrible in 2017. So much so that he was optioned to the minors and subsequently designated for assignment. There are no winners here.

Chase Anderson

	IP	HR	WHIP	BABIP	K/9	BB/9	K%	BB%	ERA	FIP	XFIP
RW23	138	25	1.40	.295	7.37	3.12	18.9%	8.0%	4.82	5.03	4.51
Steamer	133	18	1.37	.301	7.81	2.83	20.0%	7.2%	4.72	4.56	4.43
ZiPS	139	22	1.38	.308	7.28	2.96	18.5%	7.5%	4.64	4.67	N/A
Actual	141.1	14	1.09	.265	8.47	2.61	23.4%	7.2%	2.74	3.58	4.33

Winner: Steamer

So far the projections haven’t been able to figure out Brewers pitchers in 2017, but once again, Steamer was the closest on Anderson, particularly regarding his peripherals. Anderson posted a sub-3.00 ERA that no one saw coming, and he heads into next season as the Brewers top pitcher.

Jacob Barnes

	IP	HR	WHIP	BABIP	K/9	BB/9	K%	BB%	ERA	FIP	XFIP
RW23	52	4	1.20	.293	9.09	3.12	24.5%	8.4%	3.10	3.18	3.54
Steamer	35	4	1.32	.304	8.98	3.28	23.3%	8.5%	3.94	3.84	3.88
ZiPS	53	5	1.27	.313	9.56	3.35	24.9%	8.7%	3.52	3.46	N/A
Actual	72	8	1.25	.272	10.00	4.13	26.3%	10.9%	4.00	3.88	3.67

Winner: Steamer

ZiPS had more of Barnes’ peripheral stats correct, but Steamer takes the cake with its ERA/FIP/xFIP projections. Barnes was wild and didn’t command the strike zone as well as RW23 thought he would. However, his strikeout numbers are great, and he should once again be in the back end of the bullpen and used in high-leverage situations next season.

Corey Knebel

	IP	HR	WHIP	BABIP	K/9	BB/9	K%	BB%	ERA	FIP	XFIP
RW23	63	6	1.22	.297	10.32	3.48	27.6%	9.3%	3.24	3.29	3.43
Steamer	65	7	1.28	.302	10.66	3.77	27.9%	9.9%	3.56	3.49	3.56
ZiPS	54	7	1.27	.316	11.28	3.81	29.3%	9.9%	3.65	3.68	N/A
Actual	76	6	1.16	.311	14.92	4.74	40.8%	12.9%	1.78	2.53	2.97

Winner: ZiPS

I could’ve given the win to RW23, but once again, ZiPS was more consistent throughout. Knebel put together his best season of his professional career and finished with the fourth-highest strikeout rate among qualified relievers.

Carlos Torres

	IP	HR	WHIP	BABIP	K/9	BB/9	K%	BB%	ERA	FIP	XFIP
RW23	73	9	1.28	.285	8.16	3.26	21.5%	8.6%	3.76	4.10	4.08
Steamer	55	7	1.36	.304	8.58	3.33	22.0%	8.6%	4.17	4.09	4.09
ZiPS	80	11	1.33	.301	8.74	3.59	22.4%	9.2%	3.92	4.29	N/A
Actual	72.2	10	1.53	.309	6.94	4.09	17.4%	10.3%	4.21	4.89	4.96

Winner: Steamer

All three systems missed the target on Torres, as his ERA rose by almost 1.5 runs from 2016. He was ourighted by Milwaukee a few weeks ago.

Jared Hughes

	IP	HR	WHIP	BABIP	K/9	BB/9	K%	BB%	ERA	FIP	XFIP
RW23	62	5	1.38	.292	5.11	2.95	13.0%	7.5%	3.99	4.39	4.43
Steamer	10	1	1.46	.308	6.06	3.41	15.3%	8.6%	4.34	4.40	4.46
ZiPS	63	6	1.41	.303	5.12	2.98	N/A	N/A	3.69	4.52	N/A
Actual	59.2	4	1.22	.278	7.24	3.62	19.7%	9.8%	3.02	3.93	3.98

Winner: RW23

At the time I published my original projections post, Steamer hadn’t updated Hughes’ projection. Same with ZiPS for K% and BB%. So I guess by default, RW23 is the winner. Hughes — who was another quality under-the-radar pickup by David Stearns — was an extremely valuable asset in Milwaukee’s bullpen, and the 32 year old should have a similar role in 2018.

Final Results

Steamer: 5 wins

ZiPS: 2 wins

RW23: 2 wins

The World Series is over (congratulations to World Series champion Mike Fiers) but for fans of the Milwaukee Brewers, the offseason began long ago. The Brewers missed the playoffs by an inch, and although playing in October would’ve been incredible, the season as a whole was a great success. I’ve said this before and I’ll say it again; the future is bright in Milwaukee. I fully believe this team is just a year or two away from being a perennial playoff team, something the Brewers have never really been.

But now that the season is over, it’s time to revisit the projections by comparing my own system (RW23) that was created with the help of Mike Podhorzer and his book Projecting X 2.0, with popular projection systems Steamer and ZiPS. This was the first year I had ever created projections, and I’m curious to see how they held up.

Below you’ll find every Brewers hitter I projected in the preseason, along with Steamer and ZiPS projections, compared to said player’s actual 2017 statistical line. Pitcher projection results will soon follow the publication of this article.

Manny Pina

	PA	AB	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	WOBA	K%	BB%	BABIP	HR
RW23	360	330	.246	.302	.356	.658	.110	.290	16.1%	7.0%	.275	8
Steamer	109	99	.250	.305	.384	.689	.135	.298	17.2%	6.6%	.282	3
ZiPS	304	278	.241	.291	.371	.662	.129	.286	16.4%	5.9%	.271	6
Actual	359	330	.279	.327	.424	.751	.145	.323	22.0%	5.6%	.339	9

Winner: Steamer

Even though Steamer vastly miscalculated Pina’s playing time while RW23 was dead accurate, Steamer’s projections were consistently more spot on, giving it the win. Neither of the three thought Pina would have the offensive season he mustered. Kudos to him.

Eric Thames

	PA	AB	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	WOBA	K%	BB%	BABIP	HR
RW23	535	478	.265	.334	.517	.851	.252	.360	26.4%	9.3%	.308	31
Steamer	534	470	.272	.350	.515	.864	.243	.364	24.2%	9.6%	.313	29
ZiPS	507	450	.247	.321	.493	.815	.247	.343	28.2%	8.7%	.297	26
Actual	551	469	.247	.359	.518	.877	.271	.369	29.6%	13.6%	.309	31

Winner: RW23

Another close one with Steamer, but RW23 earns its first win. It correctly predicted Thames’ home run total and was just a point off in slugging and BABIP. Thames produced an excellent season for the Brewers and was definitely a major upgrade over Chris Carter. ZiPS, meanwhile, is still looking to get on the scoreboard.

Jonathan Villar

	PA	AB	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	WOBA	K%	BB%	BABIP	HR
RW23	625	545	.260	.348	.398	.746	.137	.326	24.9%	11.8%	.336	15
Steamer	641	563	.255	.333	.397	.731	.142	.318	25.3%	10.0%	.329	15
ZiPS	584	515	.256	.332	.410	.742	.153	.322	26.9%	9.8%	.338	15
Actual	436	403	.241	.293	.372	.665	.132	.287	30.3%	6.9%	.330	11

Winner: N/A

Jonathan Villar was awful in 2017. While each system projected regression from his phenomenal and unsustainable 2016 campaign, none had him falling off the face of the earth. He eventually lost his starting job to Eric Sogard and Neil Walker, and I wouldn’t be surprised if he finds himself displaced from the roster next year.

Travis Shaw

	PA	AB	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	WOBA	K%	BB%	BABIP	HR
RW23	541	485	.254	.322	.439	.761	.185	.330	24.4%	8.7%	.301	22
Steamer	388	347	.245	.314	.431	.745	.186	.319	23.3%	8.6%	.286	15
ZiPS	542	492	.246	.308	.433	.741	.187	.316	22.9%	7.9%	.287	20
Actual	606	538	.273	.349	.513	.862	.240	.361	23.1%	9.9%	.312	31

Winner: RW23

RW23 was a little more bullish than Steamer and ZiPS, though Shaw still managed to exceed all projections and expectations. He set a career high with 31 home runs and had his best season of his career. Not the most accurate projection by RW23, but it somewhat projected his breakout.

Orlando Arcia

	PA	AB	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	WOBA	K%	BB%	BABIP	HR
RW23	580	537	.255	.304	.383	.688	.129	.300	17.5%	6.5%	.293	12
Steamer	538	497	.246	.292	.375	.667	.129	.288	18.3%	5.8%	.286	10
ZiPS	635	593	.245	.289	.379	.669	.135	.288	20.2%	5.5%	.291	13
Actual	548	506	.277	.324	.407	.731	.130	.309	18.2%	6.6%	.317	15

Winner: RW23

Once again, RW23 was overall just more consistent. Arcia managed to outperform the projections and turned out to be somewhat of a better hitter than people expected. He still only finished with an 85 wRC+, so there’s room for improvement from the 23 year old.

Ryan Braun

	PA	AB	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	WOBA	K%	BB%	BABIP	HR
RW23	555	496	.291	.355	.495	.850	.204	.362	18.6%	8.6%	.320	24
Steamer	544	487	.280	.346	.492	.838	.212	.353	19.3%	8.7%	.310	24
ZiPS	548	497	.282	.343	.477	.820	.195	.347	18.4%	8.0%	.313	22
Actual	425	380	.268	.336	.487	.823	.218	.347	17.9%	8.9%	.292	17

Winner: ZiPS

ZiPS earns its first win, as it accurately predicted Braun’s wOBA and was just a couple points off of his OPS. Braun’s home run power disappeared in 2017, and he just didn’t look like the player he used to be. With the crop of young outfielders the Brewers are ready to employ, Braun’s future is a little up in the air.

Keon Broxton

	PA	AB	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	WOBA	K%	BB%	BABIP	HR
RW23	522	456	.242	.331	.413	.743	.170	.325	31.0%	11.4%	.337	15
Steamer	530	466	.222	.304	.378	.683	.156	.298	32.9%	10.2%	.315	15
ZiPS	469	417	.216	.297	.408	.705	.192	.304	37.3%	10.0%	.325	16
Actual	463	414	.220	.299	.420	.819	.200	.308	37.8%	8.6%	.323	20

Winner: ZiPS

Keon Broxton led MLB in strikeout rate (minimum 400 PA), and ZiPS nailed it on the head with that one. ZiPS was scary accurate throughout Broxton’s projection, while RW23 turned out to be way too optimistic. The centerfielder was, however, able to knock out 20 home runs, but his 84 wRC+ left a lot to be desired.

Domingo Santana

	PA	AB	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	WOBA	K%	BB%	BABIP	HR
RW23	515	441	.256	.354	.490	.843	.234	.362	31.0%	12.3%	.341	23
Steamer	517	448	.253	.343	.449	.792	.197	.342	28.8%	11.4%	.327	21
ZiPS	466	408	.243	.333	.441	.774	.199	.334	32.6%	11.2%	.335	19
Actual	607	525	.278	.371	.505	.875	.227	.372	29.3%	12.0%	.363	30

Winner: RW23

This one wasn’t all that close. RW23 correctly predicted Santana’s breakout, particularly when it came to his power numbers. Personally, I’ve been a die-hard believer in Santana as a prospect and a player, and it’s nice to see him perform at such at high level in his 25-age season. He led the Brewers in wRC+ and while 30 home runs might be his peak, expect his OBP numbers to increase as he continues to get a better feel for the strike zone.

Hernan Perez

	PA	AB	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	WOBA	K%	BB%	BABIP	HR
RW23	315	296	.261	.296	.383	.679	.122	.295	21.6%	4.7%	.314	7
Steamer	402	379	.261	.294	.385	.679	.124	.292	19.6%	4.2%	.308	8
ZiPS	486	458	.266	.293	.400	.693	.133	.296	18.1%	3.7%	.308	10
Actual	458	432	.259	.289	.414	.704	.155	.298	17.2%	4.4%	.286	14

Winner: ZiPS

ZiPS believed Perez would get more playing than a typical utility player, and it was right. For the second straight year, Perez set a career high in home runs and is destined to play a similar role for the Brewers in 2018.

Jett Bandy

	PA	AB	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	WOBA	K%	BB%	BABIP	HR
RW23	300	280	.267	.304	.457	.761	.190	.326	17.8%	3.9%	.282	14
Steamer	218	199	.237	.288	.393	.681	.156	.294	19.7%	4.9%	.267	7
ZiPS	337	307	.225	.278	.378	.655	.153	.284	22.8%	4.2%	.260	11
Actual	188	169	.207	.287	.349	.636	.142	.280	27.1%	8.0%	.259	6

Winner: ZiPS

Bandy started out hot to begin the year, but the catcher eventually cooled and was optioned to the minors. He has raw power and RW23 expected to see that in 2017. It’s hard to envision Bandy making the Opening Day roster in 2018 with Manny Pina and Stephen Vogt still on the roster, but a eye-opening spring could keep him in Milwaukee’s plans.

Jesus Aguilar

	PA	AB	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	WOBA	K%	BB%	BABIP	HR
RW23	145	134	.231	.283	.334	.617	.103	.273	22.3%	6.5%	.280	3
Steamer	99	90	.238	.303	.411	.714	.174	.306	23.0%	7.9%	.276	4
ZiPS	568	516	.250	.310	.448	.758	.198	.322	23.1%	7.6%	.283	26
Actual	311	279	.265	.331	.505	.837	.240	.351	30.2%	8.0%	.337	16

Winner: ZiPS

Aguilar is arguably the biggest surprise of the 2017 campaign. He’s a relatively unknown player who just happened to post a 112 wRC+ off the bench in his first full season in MLB. RW23 and Steamer didn’t believe in him at all. Sure, he had a fantastic spring training, but spring training stats are relatively meaningless. It will be interesting to see what the projections look like for Aguilar next year.

Final Results

ZiPS: 5 wins

RW23: 4 wins

Steamer: 1 win